Feel ya! I wanted to wait until I’d walked my mind around Module 4 a few more times (and given others a chance to post) before going at your question, but I’ll give it a shot now. (Caveat Emptor: I am no authority, just a student like most of us. I am deeply engaged with Module 4 is all I got to offer.)
- Am I correct that the ARK crystal has a virtually perfect tetrahedral atomic structure ? More perfect than almost any natural quartz crystal as natural ones are always flawed ?
Yes on both scores. (Within a month or two I hope to be able to link to the source in Module 4, I beg patience.) The ARK crystal is grown under carefully controlled laboratory conditions to generate a nearly unblemished crystalline microstructure unobtainable in nature. The crystal is a truncated tetrahedron of specific dimensions that resonate with Haramein’s Phi - 10^20 - the ratio of scale that obtains between the PSU (Planck Spherical Unit oscillator - the pixels of the cosmos), the proton, and the cosmos (Haramein calls cosmos “universe” (“one-word”) but in his model, a parent cosmos spawned our cosmos, so there is necessarily more than one.) The resonance causes the ARK Crystal to emit energy - “about 300 photons per second”.
- Is this perfection necessary in order to resonate with the energies of the vacuum ? And this is why they were created, to be used in energy generation technology ?
Yes and no. The perfection is necessary to achieve noise-free resonance. Resonance is the coupling mechanism the crystal employs. It can be used for energy generation, and indeed, Nassim said that it generates about 300 photons per second of energy on its own. But the applications range far beyond that, especially to communications (potential for faster-than-light comms via wormhole?), health, agriculture… Resonance is a “foundational technology” (to borrow Steve Wozniak’s term.) It enables many more.
- I believe the dimensions of the crystal were also carefully chosen ? It appears to be almost one of the 13 Archimedean forms called the ‘truncated tetrahedron’. But the hexagons do not seem perfect. Can anyone explain the logic behind its exact form ?
Can’t say why the hexagons aren’t perfect (equal-sided). Good question! The dimensions would be an integer multiple of the precise value of Haramein’s phi.
I don’t know yet but I speculate that the ARK replicates the northern tetrahedral half of the Merkaba (the counter-rotating two-lobed human Prana energy field in which the chakras emerge which is continuous with the Flower-of-Life shaped resonant PSU matrix of the Cosmos), the energy-emitting half. The receptive (female) southern half is “generated by implication/induction” as a harmonic of the active (male) north. The truncation creates an additional four faces that mirror one another resonantly, and I suspect that the ratio of the area of the large faces to the small faces is also an integer multiple of H-Phi. Hexagons (a pair of inverted triangles) are the geometric shape that tiles the flower of life resonant matrix of the cosmos.
It may be that there is a natural principle of flow that the resonance between corresponding features of like-geometric structures (and more complex ones) generate a flow of energy/matter from the higher energy/frequency to the lower energy structure, and that in turn induces a corresponding and precisely balanced counter-flow of some complementary quantity.
The PSU, the proton, and the Cosmos would be such corresponding geometric structures. That would be why the ARK Crystal emits energy passively. Energy drains from the highly energetic but very small quantum scale PSUs that form the microstructure of space to protons (spinning at lightspeed) to the ARK Crystal at the human scale and then drains outward into the energy sink of the cosmos at large.
Any of that make sense? Anyone got other better ideas? Kudos to Kinzierw for posting a great thread.
[EDIT: I just noticed William Brown’s detailed response to your questions above. More later, I guess.]
[EDIT 2: Seems William’s explanation jibes pretty well with mine. Let me know if otherwise, please.]